Contact Technology Comparison of Fuzz Buttons Floss Pin®
Contact Technology Comparison 接触技术的比较
Technology |
Areas of Consideration |
Pogo Pins |
The signal travels on the outside of the structure, increasing signal path length and distortion. Many component parts mean more points of potential failure. |
Spring Probes |
Known to be a somewhat expensive approach. Often a longer contact height than is optimal. Have a very complex structure meaning more potential points of failure. |
Hyperboloid SuperButton® |
Challenging to assemble into carriers. Component wires sometimes separate from body during usage. Not intended for high mating cycle applications. |
Solder |
Fragile in harsh environments such as shock, vibration and high temperatures, prone to cracking. Often not RoHS compliant due to lead content contamination.. |
Fuzz Buttons® |
Signal travels via shortest path within the Fuzz Button® structure; diminishing distortion, resistance and inductance. Simple single piece architecture means a more reliable contact. When used in conjunction with Hardhats, high mating cycles can be achieved with little signal degradation. Always Lead-Free and RoHS. |
CIN:APSE® |
|
Floss Pin®毛纽扣 |
- Previous:Floss Pin® Common Applications 2016/3/27
- Next:Floss pin ® has extensive experience in military and aerospace applications 2020/2/4